Please stop sending me e-mails extolling the illegality of or future damnation from a government led by a President Barack Obama.
I’ve had enough.
The latest one claimed that Obama was not a U.S. citizen because of a variety of reasons, including that Hawaii was not a state when he was born and that his mother was visiting Africa at the time of his birth and should have been at least age 21 for him to be a citizen.
Come on, people. Is this what public education has come to?
I asked others, including friends and politicians, how they deal with such ignorant communications.
They ignore them, for the most part, after reading a few lines to learn the gist of the message.
I was surprised, though, by the number of folks who say they don’t get the barrage I am blessed with.
I’m just lucky.
Why would our federal government or the Democratic Party allow anyone who doesn’t qualify get this far in the process without having searched through his background quite thoroughly?
But just to answer the person who saw fit to write to me about this problem of Obama’s citizenship, let me clarify a couple of things.
Hawaii was indeed a state when Obama was born on Aug. 4, 1961, at Kapiolani Medical Center in Honolulu. Hawii became a state in 1959.
Anyone born in the U.S. is a U.S. citizen. Period. The information concerning his mother’s age applies only if she lived outside of the U.S. when he was born, according to Snopes.com, a Web site I suggest everyone check out when you get one of the e-mails that are meant to inject fear into your hearts.
According to the 14th Amendment to our Constitution: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
Obama was born in the U.S. He is a U.S. citizen. Let’s move on to the issues concerning the high costs of health care, the increasing profits the insatiable oil companies are making, and how we are going to educate our children.
Why are we focusing our efforts on this bovine feces?
If it is not the fear-mongering e-mails, then it is news accounts of disappointed supporters of Sen. Hillary Clinton about the place she should have had on Obama’s ticket as a vice presidential nominee..
Every time I turn on the TV I see another campaign ad from Sen. John McCain rehashing what Clinton said during the primaries about Obama.
No doubt it was a hard-fought battle that drew millions of voters into the voting booths. But that campaign also gave McCain all the bullets he needed to fire away at Obama’s run for the presidency.
Why would anyone want that person on his or her ticket? It is a free-for-all for Republicans without her on the ticket, just by using her words. What would it have been like with her on the ticket, trying at every stop to eat those words?
She lost the primary. He has a right to pick his V.P. Let’s stick to the issues.
When are we going to bring the soldiers home from Iraq?
What can we do to bring down gasoline prices while not further damaging the environment?
What can be done to ensure our elderly, our young and all working Americans will feel financially secure when illness or accidents strike and medical services are needed?
I have a disabled friend who is so allergic to some medications that she has to pay upwards of $200 with Medicare for one of her monthly prescriptions.
Every so often, her body forms an immunity to that medication and a new one is required. Each time the prescriptions cost more and more.
It is unsettling to have to watch her dance through a maze of pharmaceutical manufacturers trying to find one that will help her pay for the prescriptions or for programs that will help.
Where is the help coming for her?
But instead of trying to decide which candidate will actually improve our lot, will have ideas good enough to turn this train we’re traveling on around, we’re talking about how McCain doesn’t know how many houses he owns or whether Obama’s mother secretly gave birth to him in Kenya.
We’ve got to start demanding more from our candidates, their political parties, and their campaigns.
That’s the change that must come and it must start now.

I am a native Kentuckian, and I have worked at the Lexington Herald-Leader for nearly a quarter of a century. I've been a columnist for almost 20 of those years, dispensing my opinions about anything and everything. Born in Owensboro, Ky., I'm old enough to have lived through racial segregation, the Civil Rights Movement, protests against the Vietnam War, and the break-up of the Beatles. That means I am "old school," and my thoughts emanate from that perspective.
3 Comments
August 26, 2008 at 7:02 pm
So…….you think Obama will change things…….you need to wake up from your daydream. He will change things, but I am afraid not for the better. He is definately not a JFK………..and if he had lived who’s to say we would be singing his praises today. Yes, I am a McCain supporter. It has nothing to do with race…..but about morals! So you believe all the stories about his Rev. Wright are nonsense? I think you may need to rethink things. This is just my humble opinion just like the article was yours.
August 26, 2008 at 10:14 pm
Merlene, I don’t doubt that you get some crazy (and uninformed) emails. There are wackos on both sides. But why should BHO stick to the issues? Why should he even talk about the issues? I’ve yet to hear from a single BHO supporter that can show me he or she actually cares about “issues”. All they seem to care about is that BHO uses the word *change*. Who cares WHAT that change is or HOW it will be changed? If voters really did care to have those questions answered, candidates would be forced not only to speak in more than just a soundbyte, but actually provide details for their plans. For those few who are “undecided” and do care to find those answers, the vast majority will not be voting for a man that will not provide answers. BHO’s base couldn’t care less what his plans are (assuming they even know). All they care about it is electing someone that is a *change* to the current administration. When people look to an elected leader to solve their problems for them, it’s already too late. Reagan was right about government not being the solution, rather the problem. The context he spoke those words in aren’t much different than today. Before you vote for any candidate, ask yourself how will they empower YOU to be better, do better, achieve more? That’s not accomplished by additional taxes, regulation, or more government control. BHO will join the likes John Kerry as men who were not elected because they never put forth their vision of what change means in a more tangible manner.
As for Merlene’s story about her disabled friend not able to afford her medication, my heart goes out to everyone who is in a situation of difficulty. However, let’s drill down a bit further and ask the question, what did this individual (not her governmen) do during her life to provide for these situations? Did she take advantage of every opportunity to educate herself and get a good job that will allow her to provide the medications or treatments she needs? I certainly don’t claim to know anyone’s specific situation, but why aren’t we focused more on doing what we can for ourselves earlier in life than ending up in a position later where we have to rely on the government? Do we now think its the government’s fault she lacks the ability to pay? Is it the government’s responsibility to ensure that she is given a job to take care of these needs? How about instead of focusing on the end cost now, we attempt to create (and not punish or stifle) competition so that medications are rolled out as more affordable. You won’t find a liberal who has anyting nice to say about drug companies though. How about applauding Wal*Mart for making certain prescriptions available for $8, less in certain locations. But you won’t find a liberal who has anything nice to say about Wal*Mart.
McCain wins this election not because he’d necessarily be a better leader, although I think he would be. He wins because he speaks using less empty campaign slogans than does BHO. Please, somebody tell BHO that the word *change* is not a magic word that entitles its speaker to be the ruler of the Free World.
August 27, 2008 at 1:43 am
Merlene, Merlene……
I am so glad your education along with your moral fiber leave you to wobble around on the East side of Limestone…….
People are so tired of you and your race card, so now you try to use the “commonsense” approach. Funny thing is, you are about 20 years too late.
Semper Fi